What proof is required regarding actual damages for an injunction under Section 6-311?

Under Section 6-311, it is established that no proof of actual damage is required to obtain an injunction. This means that a party seeking an injunction does not need to demonstrate that they have suffered any quantifiable harm before a court will grant the injunction. The focus is instead on the need to prevent future harm or to stop ongoing unlawful conduct, rather than to redress past injuries. This principle allows for the issuance of protective orders even when the individual has not yet experienced specific damages, emphasizing proactive legal relief to ensure compliance and protect rights.

Understanding this distinction is important for practitioners, as it allows them to seek injunctions based on potential threats or ongoing violations without having to prove that actual harm has already occurred. This framework provides a mechanism to address and rectify situations that may pose future risks, reflecting the law's preventive nature in such contexts.