What legal process allows individuals aggrieved by a Board decision to seek further action?

Judicial review is the correct process that allows individuals who are aggrieved by a decision made by a Board to seek further action. This legal process involves a court reviewing the decision of a regulatory or administrative body to ensure that it was made in accordance with the law. It provides a mechanism for individuals to challenge decisions that they believe to be unlawful, arbitrary, or capricious.

Through judicial review, the court will evaluate whether the Board followed proper procedures, adhered to relevant laws, and made decisions that align with their statutory authority. This check on administrative power helps maintain fairness and accountability in the regulatory process.

In contrast, while administrative grievance may seem related, it typically refers to internal processes within an organization to address complaints about actions or decisions, which may not necessarily lead to legal recourse in a court. Mediation is a method of conflict resolution through negotiation and doesn't involve a formal review of decisions made by a Board. Direct appeal to the governor is not a standard legal process used for challenging Board decisions, as the governor generally does not have the jurisdiction to overturn such administrative actions.