Under what circumstances can the Governor remove a member from the Board?

The Governor's ability to remove a member from the Board is specifically tied to the principles of accountability and professional standards that ensure the Board operates effectively. The correct answer—removal for incompetence or misconduct—reflects the necessity of maintaining a high standard of professional integrity and competence within the Board. This is crucial, as members are expected to uphold the ethical and professional expectations of the licensed massage therapy community in Maryland.

Incompetence can manifest as a lack of ability or skill in executing the responsibilities entrusted to a Board member, while misconduct refers to any behavior that breaches the ethical standards set for the profession, which may harm the integrity of the Board or the public's trust in the profession. These grounds for removal serve to ensure that only capable and ethical individuals govern the practice, thereby safeguarding the interests of both practitioners and the public.

The other options are less relevant because they do not typically warrant removal under the standards expected for membership on a regulatory board. For instance, lack of experience may be addressed through training and guided mentorship rather than outright removal. Not attending training sessions might be a matter of internal policy enforcement rather than a matter severe enough for the Governor to intervene, and political disagreements, while common in many boards, should not affect a member's ability